Gentoo Archives: gentoo-qa

From: "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o>
To: gentoo-qa@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-qa] QA power to suspend access [WAS: Re: Roll-call for the team members and requesting a new election]
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 21:04:26
Message-Id: 4C815764.2040102@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-qa] QA power to suspend access [WAS: Re: Roll-call for the team members and requesting a new election] by "Diego Elio Pettenò"
On 09/03/2010 10:06 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> Il giorno ven, 03/09/2010 alle 19.43 +0300, Petteri Räty ha scritto: >> >> It doesn't require infra as DevRel has the needed powers to shut down >> access. DevRel is needed any way to process the retirement. I think >> infra should only be the fallback if DevRel people with needed access >> are not available fast enough. > > If you couldn't notice, we're explicitly trying to get this done without > DevRel intervention at first. > > Right now we have something along these lines: > > QA team member finds the screwup → reports to QA lead → ask nicely the > devrel read → devrel can sit thinking about it. >
I didn't propose allowing DevRel to refuse. I find it simpler to have less people involved. Regards, Petteri

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature