1 |
On Sat, 2 Dec 2006 14:11:46 +0100 |
2 |
Torsten Veller <tove@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Hello, |
5 |
> |
6 |
> so what's going on with the devmanual? |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Current situation AFAIK: |
9 |
> After the repo has been moved to Gentoo hardware, |
10 |
> Stephen Bennett (spb) and Christel Dahlskjaer (christel) and the |
11 |
> Council members have write permission and every dev can check it out |
12 |
> with: `svn co svn+ssh://devname@××××××××××.org/var/svnroot/devmanual` |
13 |
|
14 |
That's about it. For the moment, anyone else will have to push updates |
15 |
through one of the above. Other QA members can request commit access if |
16 |
they're going to be doing significant work on it. |
17 |
|
18 |
> With the new bugzilla we will also get a devmanual component in the |
19 |
> "Doc Other" product. New bugs will be assigned to qa@g.o. |
20 |
|
21 |
So I'm told, yes. |
22 |
|
23 |
> Currently devmanual's project page is outdated: |
24 |
> <http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/devmanual.xml> |
25 |
> But I don't know what should be added there. |
26 |
|
27 |
Ouch, yes. I'll update that; thanks for pointing it out. |
28 |
|
29 |
> The future: |
30 |
> - moving to guide-xml? |
31 |
|
32 |
I'd rather not, personally. I won't rule it out though, if someone |
33 |
presents a convincing argument. |
34 |
|
35 |
> - moving to rst? |
36 |
|
37 |
This would be preferable from my point of view -- it's much nicer to |
38 |
work with than the current XML. |
39 |
|
40 |
> - diff mailinglist for reviewing changes and to keep people up to |
41 |
> date? |
42 |
|
43 |
Not a bad idea. Someone might consider asking infra to set this up. |
44 |
-- |
45 |
gentoo-qa@g.o mailing list |