Archives
Archives
| From: | "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-qa@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-qa] QA power to suspend access [WAS: Re: Roll-call for the team members and requesting a new election] | ||
| Date: | Fri, 03 Sep 2010 17:04:46 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4C8125BB.6050408@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-qa] QA power to suspend access [WAS: Re: Roll-call for the team members and requesting a new election] by Mark Loeser |
||
| 1 | On 09/03/2010 06:12 PM, Mark Loeser wrote: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > If a particular developer persistently causes breakage, the QA team |
| 4 | > can request infra to revoke the developer's commit rights, and will |
| 5 | > contact devrel to help mediate the case. The QA team can request that |
| 6 | > the commit rights be revoked either by the lead asking, or 2 members |
| 7 | > of the QA team requesting such an action be taken. |
| 8 | > |
| 9 | |
| 10 | It doesn't require infra as DevRel has the needed powers to shut down |
| 11 | access. DevRel is needed any way to process the retirement. I think |
| 12 | infra should only be the fallback if DevRel people with needed access |
| 13 | are not available fast enough. |
| 14 | |
| 15 | Regards, |
| 16 | Petteri |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-qa] QA power to suspend access [WAS: Re: Roll-call for the team members and requesting a new election] | "Diego Elio Pettenò" <flameeyes@×××××.com> |