1 |
On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 21:08 -0400, Alec Warner wrote: |
2 |
> Christel Dahlskjaer wrote: |
3 |
> > On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 02:45 +0100, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote: |
4 |
> >> On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 19:39 -0400, Alec Warner wrote: |
5 |
> > <snip> |
6 |
> >>> I'm not trying to be a nagger here, but even if he did approve her; |
7 |
> >>> where is the mail saying so? I'd prefer more transparency than just the |
8 |
> >>> lead randomly adding someone and not informing the rest of the team. |
9 |
> >>> God knows if I tried to join some other teams (hahaha mips, not like I'd |
10 |
> >>> get the leads approval) the entire team would be rather dismayed at |
11 |
> >>> finding me magically added. |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > Incidentally, if you have a problem with me, why not come out and say it |
14 |
> > rather than using everything you can find as an excuse to attack me |
15 |
> > under the guise of following procedure? |
16 |
> > If you'd rather not discuss it face to face, I'd have no objections to |
17 |
> > you asking for a third party to help mediate. But please stop this |
18 |
> > puerile (something)ery. |
19 |
> > |
20 |
> > |
21 |
> |
22 |
> I don't; I'd prefer a "Hey this person is joining the team to do thing |
23 |
> X" then just randomly discovering additions to the team. Tis how we end |
24 |
> up with projects full of people that don't do anything in the first place. |
25 |
|
26 |
That I suspect is very true, and I agree. I'm sure it was on his TODO |
27 |
list. :) |
28 |
|
29 |
|
30 |
-- |
31 |
gentoo-qa@g.o mailing list |