Gentoo Archives: gentoo-qa

From: "Tomáš Chvátal" <scarabeus@g.o>
To: gentoo-qa@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-qa] Project layout (what should we do)
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 13:06:54
Message-Id: 4BD03EC0.6050700@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-qa] Project layout (what should we do) by Samuli Suominen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Dne 22.4.2010 13:49, Samuli Suominen napsal(a):
> On 04/22/2010 01:33 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: >> I have this idea of what areas we as QA should work: >> >> [treecleaners] >> Guys responsible for maintaining profiles and removing packages that >> in long-term fails to meet up QA standards. > > treecleaners is mostly for maintainer-needed@ packages, and for bugs > where maintainer has ACK'd the removal (or there has been a general > consensus the package is no good). so that's the ebuild aspect. > > profiles in other hand have been responsibility of the release@ team, > but since that hasn't lately been really the case... qa@ has been taking > care of it. > > my point being: what does treecleaners have to do with profiles? >
Well basicaly i was not sure under what part it fits best. And i usually cleanup stuff there when i do treecleaning thus i placed it under them. Basicaly only thing relevant to the outsider should be "QA is working on profiles" and not really care what subproject is working on it. The leveling i wrote here is just for some visual split to see where we need to get "recruits" :] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkvQPsAACgkQHB6c3gNBRYc0dQCgrDcPiL4wkPBeh+kYoi7NdZ2M 8GEAnjNxeHCXjoF9WaWjO7z0VvqVbB7M =YnPI -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----