1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
Dne 22.1.2011 22:07, Diego Elio Pettenò napsal(a): |
5 |
> Hi all, |
6 |
> |
7 |
> since we've been having a bit of a scratch again regarding the extension |
8 |
> of details defined by GLEP48, I'm trying to edit it a bit to make it |
9 |
> work a bit more smoothly for our needs. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> I'm attaching the diff I'd like to propose the council; please let me |
12 |
> know your comments. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Thanks, |
15 |
"The QA team lead can choose one member as deputy, whose decisions |
16 |
should be considered as they were made by the lead in case he (or she) |
17 |
is not available." |
18 |
"The QA team lead can choose one member as deputy. Deputy has all his |
19 |
powers directly delegated from the QA team lead and so his actions and |
20 |
decisions should be considered equal the QA team lead. Deputy is |
21 |
directly responsible only to the QA team lead." |
22 |
|
23 |
NEW: |
24 |
"Any QA team lead decision can be rewoked by major opposing vote from |
25 |
all current QA members. Given the nature of this action new elections |
26 |
should be held within 1 month to elect new QA team lead." |
27 |
|
28 |
"In case a particular developer persistently causes breakage, the QA |
29 |
lead may request his (or her) commit rights to be suspended. Devrel |
30 |
should then proceed to evalute the situation, by finding a compromise or |
31 |
definitely revoking those rights." |
32 |
"In case a particular developer persistently causes breakage, the QA |
33 |
lead may request commit rights of given developer to be suspended by |
34 |
Infra team. Devrel should then proceed to evaluate the situation, by |
35 |
finding a compromise or definitely revoking those rights." |
36 |
|
37 |
Reworded a bit: |
38 |
"Should a situation arise where a developer causes breakage to the point |
39 |
it cannot be ascribed to bona-fide mistake, either the QA lead or two |
40 |
members of the QA team can require the Infra team to temporarily suspend |
41 |
access to said developer, pending analysis of the causes and resolution |
42 |
to be provided by QA team within a 14 days of said suspension. |
43 |
Resolution for this kind of issues is completely in hands of the QA team |
44 |
and only the Gentoo Council can revisit the case." |
45 |
|
46 |
Cheers |
47 |
Tom |
48 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
49 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) |
50 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ |
51 |
|
52 |
iEYEARECAAYFAk08GIIACgkQHB6c3gNBRYfw1QCdERvoGS321L4VuD4dYJEQxDUk |
53 |
ewIAnjUQShytmgZEsI+01xIXn60gnm9N |
54 |
=CzxW |
55 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |