Gentoo Archives: gentoo-qa

From: "Tomáš Chvátal" <scarabeus@g.o>
To: gentoo-qa@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-qa] Proposed changes to GLEP48
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 12:06:17
Message-Id: 4D3C1882.7070203@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-qa] Proposed changes to GLEP48 by "Diego Elio Pettenò"
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Dne 22.1.2011 22:07, Diego Elio Pettenò napsal(a):
5 > Hi all,
6 >
7 > since we've been having a bit of a scratch again regarding the extension
8 > of details defined by GLEP48, I'm trying to edit it a bit to make it
9 > work a bit more smoothly for our needs.
10 >
11 > I'm attaching the diff I'd like to propose the council; please let me
12 > know your comments.
13 >
14 > Thanks,
15 "The QA team lead can choose one member as deputy, whose decisions
16 should be considered as they were made by the lead in case he (or she)
17 is not available."
18 "The QA team lead can choose one member as deputy. Deputy has all his
19 powers directly delegated from the QA team lead and so his actions and
20 decisions should be considered equal the QA team lead. Deputy is
21 directly responsible only to the QA team lead."
22
23 NEW:
24 "Any QA team lead decision can be rewoked by major opposing vote from
25 all current QA members. Given the nature of this action new elections
26 should be held within 1 month to elect new QA team lead."
27
28 "In case a particular developer persistently causes breakage, the QA
29 lead may request his (or her) commit rights to be suspended. Devrel
30 should then proceed to evalute the situation, by finding a compromise or
31 definitely revoking those rights."
32 "In case a particular developer persistently causes breakage, the QA
33 lead may request commit rights of given developer to be suspended by
34 Infra team. Devrel should then proceed to evaluate the situation, by
35 finding a compromise or definitely revoking those rights."
36
37 Reworded a bit:
38 "Should a situation arise where a developer causes breakage to the point
39 it cannot be ascribed to bona-fide mistake, either the QA lead or two
40 members of the QA team can require the Infra team to temporarily suspend
41 access to said developer, pending analysis of the causes and resolution
42 to be provided by QA team within a 14 days of said suspension.
43 Resolution for this kind of issues is completely in hands of the QA team
44 and only the Gentoo Council can revisit the case."
45
46 Cheers
47 Tom
48 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
49 Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
50 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
51
52 iEYEARECAAYFAk08GIIACgkQHB6c3gNBRYfw1QCdERvoGS321L4VuD4dYJEQxDUk
53 ewIAnjUQShytmgZEsI+01xIXn60gnm9N
54 =CzxW
55 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----