1 |
On 05/24/2011 04:54 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: |
2 |
> Dne 21.5.2011 15:03, Diego Elio Pettenò napsal(a): |
3 |
>> Il giorno sab, 21/05/2011 alle 12.26 +0300, Samuli Suominen ha scritto: |
4 |
>>> In light of recent events, our current lead has proofen he can't |
5 |
>>> control |
6 |
>>> himself in civil manner. It's not a behavior lead should have and |
7 |
>>> tarnishes the reputation for whole team. |
8 |
> |
9 |
>> Let it be on record that the reputation has been tarnished by QA members |
10 |
>> not following the very policy they are supposed to enforce. |
11 |
> |
12 |
>> But fine by me, I candiate me and scarabeus. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Ok, if you guys want new elections lets do it properly :) |
15 |
> |
16 |
> I propose this timetable: |
17 |
> 27.5. Nominations close - We have the list, new thread is started |
18 |
> 3.6. Voting close - New lead selected |
19 |
> |
20 |
> Voting will happen over this ML where there will be new mail thread |
21 |
> containing names of all candidates to which each developer is supposed |
22 |
> to reply. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> Where QA team size will be determined based on people who bothered to |
25 |
> vote. If a member decide not to vote he will be removed from the QA team |
26 |
> for inactivity (something like mandatory voting). |
27 |
> |
28 |
> And also i accept the nomination. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> Tomas |
31 |
|
32 |
Still the same as last time, Diego. |
33 |
|
34 |
The bug didn't change my mind. I like both of you guys and also I kinda |
35 |
understand both of you, I like your work etc. but I also still think |
36 |
that Diego is a good QA lead. I simply excluded the bug of my mind for |
37 |
this vote. |
38 |
|
39 |
So the current situation (positions/people) are still fine to me. |
40 |
|
41 |
-- |
42 |
Regards, |
43 |
Christian Ruppert |
44 |
Role: Gentoo Linux developer, Bugzilla administrator and Infrastructure |
45 |
member |
46 |
Fingerprint: EEB1 C341 7C84 B274 6C59 F243 5EAB 0C62 B427 ABC8 |