-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 02:45 +0100, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
>> On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 19:39 -0400, Alec Warner wrote:
> <snip>
>>> I'm not trying to be a nagger here, but even if he did approve her;
>>> where is the mail saying so?  I'd prefer more transparency than just the
>>> lead randomly adding someone and not informing the rest of the team.
>>> God knows if I tried to join some other teams (hahaha mips, not like I'd
>>> get the leads approval) the entire team would be rather dismayed at
>>> finding me magically added.
>
> Incidentally, if you have a problem with me, why not come out and say it
> rather than using everything you can find as an excuse to attack me
> under the guise of following procedure?
> If you'd rather not discuss it face to face, I'd have no objections to
> you asking for a third party to help mediate. But please stop this
> puerile (something)ery.
>
>
I'm glad we're social and understanding on qa as well..wonderful to
see the comradely that we have in the rank and file.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFE/hzGSENan+PfizARApGBAJwOdmfYUSh1oR6RXV2iI4wnFCA4KgCfba5E
Jh5mTgZ1rh8S90zK4hi7bn8=
=zGR+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
gentoo-qa@g.o mailing list