Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-qa
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-qa: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-qa@g.o
From: Diego Elio Pettenò <flameeyes@...>
Subject: Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage to die on sure-enough _FORTIFY_SOURCE overflows
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 00:35:03 +0200
Il giorno mar, 28/09/2010 alle 12.33 -0700, Alec Warner ha scritto:
> Its not clear to me what your purpose is.  It is likely that many
> developers will be unable to do 1.  Does that concern you?  Should
> developers ask QA for help on packages? 

Fixing the package is the solution, it's usually quick and easy to
identify; if you can bring up _any_ example of unfixable or
difficult-to-fix code, feel free.

I don't think that was not explained by me, I even wrote a whole blog
post about identifying, tracking down and fixing _FORTIFY_SOURCE
warnings.

-- 
Diego Elio Pettenò — “Flameeyes”
http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

If you found a .asc file in this mail and know not what it is,
it's a GnuPG digital signature: http://www.gnupg.org/




References:
Portage to die on sure-enough _FORTIFY_SOURCE overflows
-- Diego Elio Pettenò
Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage to die on sure-enough _FORTIFY_SOURCE overflows
-- Alec Warner
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-qa: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage to die on sure-enough _FORTIFY_SOURCE overflows
Next by thread:
My first email
Previous by date:
Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage to die on sure-enough _FORTIFY_SOURCE overflows
Next by date:
My first email


Updated Aug 26, 2011

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-qa mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.