Gentoo Archives: gentoo-qa

From: Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o>
To: gentoo-qa@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-qa] splitting up package.mask
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:54:49
Message-Id: 1205528082.6726.2.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-qa] splitting up package.mask by Marius Mauch
1 On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 08:12 +0100, Marius Mauch wrote:
2 > so depends if you want to risk breaking them.
3
4 s/want to risk/care about/
5
6 Remember, PMS isn't approved, so all we "care about" is portage. ;]
7
8 I think this seems like a good idea. I'd prefer that if we do make this
9 change, that it waits until *after* 2008.0 is released, so I don't need
10 to sync up all these changes from the tree.
11
12 --
13 Chris Gianelloni
14 Release Engineering Strategic Lead
15 Games Developer

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-qa] splitting up package.mask Mark Loeser <halcy0n@g.o>