On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 07:46:45PM +0200, Diego Elio “Flameeyes” Pettenò wrote:
> First off, checking the current list of QA members, please answer just
> to make sure you are active and still interested of being part of the
> team:
>    [...]
>  - Markos Chandras
>    [...]
Apparently I am here and as active as I can be
> 
> After this I'd like to call for an election of a new lead; I have asked
> privately for Mark to resign, or call up new elections himself, so that
> I could avoid to state it this way but I see no other choice.
> 
> Given the current (sorry) state of QA, working mostly leadless (Mark
> seems to be around when you're complaining he's not around), and with
> most members apathetic about all kind of issues, I'm proposing myself as
> new lead.
Elections might be a solution to that but even a meeting could help the
situation. It seems to me that QA is more like one,two,three individual people
doing all the work. It should be more like a team work, act as a team, backing
up a member when he is being "attacked" by other devs because he "had to" step
up and mess with their packages just to preserve future portage breakage. 
> 
> The role of the lead in this project cannot be simply a "supervising"
> [...]
> elections right away.
Diego pretty much said what I am thinking atm

-- 
Markos Chandras (hwoarang)
Gentoo Linux Developer
Web: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.org
Key ID: 441AC410
Key FP: AAD0 8591 E3CD 445D 6411 3477 F7F7 1E8E 441A C410