| 1 |
Il giorno sab, 21/08/2010 alle 20.04 +0200, Piotr Jaroszyński ha |
| 2 |
scritto: |
| 3 |
> The last election was in April and let me quote what you said then: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
I know; I actually hoped for things to take a different path than they |
| 6 |
have taken. I'm still going for enforcing; but at least the council |
| 7 |
changed; devrel would probably require some convincing (see at the |
| 8 |
bottom of this message as well). |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> I appreciate all your work, but given what you said in April and how |
| 11 |
> you are communicating now I am not convinced you are the best person |
| 12 |
> for the job. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Do you think the current situation is perfect as is, or would you like |
| 15 |
to nominate someone else beside me and the incumbent? I'm sincerely |
| 16 |
welcoming anyone else who intends on solving the current lack of lead. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> I agree that this should probably be changed. I somehow recall 2 QA |
| 19 |
> members being able to make decisions on behalf of QA if quick action |
| 20 |
> is necessary. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Devrel seems to disagree; I quote Betelgeuse from the Python 20100801 |
| 23 |
breakage: "I think to act on requests from QA alone they should come |
| 24 |
from the lead." |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Diego Elio Pettenò — “Flameeyes” |
| 28 |
http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
If you found a .asc file in this mail and know not what it is, |
| 31 |
it's a GnuPG digital signature: http://www.gnupg.org/ |
Archives