1 |
On 04/22/2010 01:33 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: |
2 |
> I have this idea of what areas we as QA should work: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> [treecleaners] |
5 |
> Guys responsible for maintaining profiles and removing packages that |
6 |
> in long-term fails to meet up QA standards. |
7 |
|
8 |
treecleaners is mostly for maintainer-needed@ packages, and for bugs |
9 |
where maintainer has ACK'd the removal (or there has been a general |
10 |
consensus the package is no good). so that's the ebuild aspect. |
11 |
|
12 |
profiles in other hand have been responsibility of the release@ team, |
13 |
but since that hasn't lately been really the case... qa@ has been taking |
14 |
care of it. |
15 |
|
16 |
my point being: what does treecleaners have to do with profiles? |