| 1 |
Piotr Jaroszyński <peper@g.o> said: |
| 2 |
> On Thursday 17 of January 2008 07:36:14 Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
> > so it's been long enough to hold another qa lead election. who wants to |
| 4 |
> > run ? i (and i imagine many others) nominate Mark. if no one else gets |
| 5 |
> > nominated, it'll streamline the election process ;) ... |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> I still want to see his resurrection plan though :] |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Imho having a meeting @ #gentoo-qa once a month or so would help us becoming a |
| 10 |
> team and not just a bunch of devs at qa alias. We could discuss the QA |
| 11 |
> problems, set goals etc. Also, the slacker marks system used in council would |
| 12 |
> quickly show who wants to be in the team and who doesn't. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
So, I have been thinking about the slacker system as well. Here's what |
| 15 |
I think we should be starting with as our plan to get back on our feet: |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
* Clear out the QA bugs. We have several bugs that are assigned to us, |
| 18 |
or have us CC'd. We should do something with these, not all are |
| 19 |
difficult, but require a few people doing some work. |
| 20 |
* Get some sort of meetings or discussions going on the mailing list, |
| 21 |
and figure out a system to ensure that everyone on the team meets |
| 22 |
criteria we decide upon for them to be considered active. |
| 23 |
* Poll the user and dev communities to find out what they see as our |
| 24 |
biggest QA issues. After we get those, we can prioritize them and |
| 25 |
find out which are even solvable. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
That's all I have for now...there are lots and lots of other things we |
| 28 |
can start to work on as well, but I think these should be our focus to |
| 29 |
start with. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
Mark Loeser |
| 33 |
email - halcy0n AT gentoo DOT org |
| 34 |
email - mark AT halcy0n DOT com |
| 35 |
web - http://www.halcy0n.com |
Archives