Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
| Navigation: |
|
Lists:
gentoo-qa:
< Prev
By Thread
Next >
< Prev
By Date
Next >
|
| Headers: |
|
To:
|
gentoo-qa@g.o
|
|
From:
|
Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o>
|
|
Subject:
|
Re: QA power to suspend access [WAS: Re: Roll-call for the team members and requesting a new election]
|
|
Date:
|
Fri, 03 Sep 2010 23:15:32 +0300
|
|
On 09/03/2010 10:06 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> Il giorno ven, 03/09/2010 alle 19.43 +0300, Petteri Räty ha scritto:
>>
>> It doesn't require infra as DevRel has the needed powers to shut down
>> access. DevRel is needed any way to process the retirement. I think
>> infra should only be the fallback if DevRel people with needed access
>> are not available fast enough.
>
> If you couldn't notice, we're explicitly trying to get this done without
> DevRel intervention at first.
>
> Right now we have something along these lines:
>
> QA team member finds the screwup → reports to QA lead → ask nicely the
> devrel read → devrel can sit thinking about it.
>
I didn't propose allowing DevRel to refuse. I find it simpler to have
less people involved.
Regards,
Petteri
|
|
