Gentoo Archives: gentoo-qa

From: "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o>
To: gentoo-qa@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-qa] QA power to suspend access [WAS: Re: Roll-call for the team members and requesting a new election]
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 21:04:26
Message-Id: 4C815764.2040102@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-qa] QA power to suspend access [WAS: Re: Roll-call for the team members and requesting a new election] by "Diego Elio Pettenò"
1 On 09/03/2010 10:06 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
2 > Il giorno ven, 03/09/2010 alle 19.43 +0300, Petteri Räty ha scritto:
3 >>
4 >> It doesn't require infra as DevRel has the needed powers to shut down
5 >> access. DevRel is needed any way to process the retirement. I think
6 >> infra should only be the fallback if DevRel people with needed access
7 >> are not available fast enough.
8 >
9 > If you couldn't notice, we're explicitly trying to get this done without
10 > DevRel intervention at first.
11 >
12 > Right now we have something along these lines:
13 >
14 > QA team member finds the screwup → reports to QA lead → ask nicely the
15 > devrel read → devrel can sit thinking about it.
16 >
17
18 I didn't propose allowing DevRel to refuse. I find it simpler to have
19 less people involved.
20
21 Regards,
22 Petteri

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature