Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-qa
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-qa: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-qa@g.o
From: Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o>
Subject: Re: QA power to suspend access [WAS: Re: Roll-call for the team members and requesting a new election]
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 23:15:32 +0300
On 09/03/2010 10:06 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> Il giorno ven, 03/09/2010 alle 19.43 +0300, Petteri Räty ha scritto:
>>
>> It doesn't require infra as DevRel has the needed powers to shut down
>> access. DevRel is needed any way to process the retirement. I think
>> infra should only be the fallback if DevRel people with needed access
>> are not available fast enough.
> 
> If you couldn't notice, we're explicitly trying to get this done without
> DevRel intervention at first.
> 
> Right now we have something along these lines:
> 
> QA team member finds the screwup → reports to QA lead → ask nicely the
> devrel read → devrel can sit thinking about it.
> 

I didn't propose allowing DevRel to refuse. I find it simpler to have
less people involved.

Regards,
Petteri

Attachment:
signature.asc (OpenPGP digital signature)
References:
QA power to suspend access [WAS: Re: Roll-call for the team members and requesting a new election]
-- Mark Loeser
Re: QA power to suspend access [WAS: Re: Roll-call for the team members and requesting a new election]
-- Diego Elio “Flameeyes” Pettenò
Re: QA power to suspend access [WAS: Re: Roll-call for the team members and requesting a new election]
-- Mark Loeser
Re: QA power to suspend access [WAS: Re: Roll-call for the team members and requesting a new election]
-- Petteri Räty
Re: QA power to suspend access [WAS: Re: Roll-call for the team members and requesting a new election]
-- Diego Elio Pettenò
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-qa: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: QA power to suspend access [WAS: Re: Roll-call for the team members and requesting a new election]
Next by thread:
Converting DevManual to Docbook 5 [WAS: Re: Official request for having Gtk+ and similar in tree p.masked before ~arch]
Previous by date:
Re: QA power to suspend access [WAS: Re: Roll-call for the team members and requesting a new election]
Next by date:
Portage to die on sure-enough _FORTIFY_SOURCE overflows


Updated Aug 26, 2011

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-qa mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.