Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
On Thursday 13 March 2008, Steve Dibb wrote:
> Because package.mask in CVS for profiles is so huge, I think it might
> help it to get organized if we split it up a bit.
>
> halcyon had a good idea for the scheme: testing, broken, removal. That
> seems to sum up the main 3 reason that a package would be masked.
>
> Right now there are 679 entries in package.mask. The reason I came up
> with the idea was to find a way to make it easier for treecleaners to
> quickly see which ones they were working on.
>
> I'd like to take the discussion to -dev but wanted to get QA's thoughts
> first. I haven't looked into whether or not this is technically
> feasible at all.
i think the real solution here is allowing masking in a package
-mike
|
| Attachment: |
|
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part.)
|
|
