1 |
On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 19:39 -0400, Alec Warner wrote: |
2 |
> Torsten Veller wrote: |
3 |
> > * Alec Warner <antarus@g.o>: |
4 |
> >> Torsten Veller wrote: |
5 |
> >>> And we have a new member: christel. |
6 |
> >> Actually according to convention you can't just join a project; you |
7 |
> >> usually need to ask the team and they kind of need to accept you. So my |
8 |
> >> question is, what are your intentions for the QA project Christel? |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > Would be nice to know, but the QA GLEP says that only current lead |
11 |
> > needs to approve. He did. |
12 |
> > The team selects the lead at any time. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Actually if you review the alias she voted for him, so how was she |
15 |
> approved prior to him being lead; if we had no lead prior to spb? |
16 |
|
17 |
Nopes. I think you will find that with qa as many other alias a lot of |
18 |
non team members are on the alias out of curiousity. qa@g.o |
19 |
currently has 26 developers on it, not all of which are part of the QA |
20 |
team. |
21 |
|
22 |
> I'm not trying to be a nagger here, but even if he did approve her; |
23 |
> where is the mail saying so? I'd prefer more transparency than just the |
24 |
> lead randomly adding someone and not informing the rest of the team. |
25 |
> God knows if I tried to join some other teams (hahaha mips, not like I'd |
26 |
> get the leads approval) the entire team would be rather dismayed at |
27 |
> finding me magically added. |
28 |
|
29 |
|
30 |
|
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
gentoo-qa@g.o mailing list |