-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Dne 22.4.2010 13:49, Samuli Suominen napsal(a):
> On 04/22/2010 01:33 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
>> I have this idea of what areas we as QA should work:
>>
>> [treecleaners]
>> Guys responsible for maintaining profiles and removing packages that
>> in long-term fails to meet up QA standards.
> 
> treecleaners is mostly for maintainer-needed@ packages, and for bugs
> where maintainer has ACK'd the removal (or there has been a general
> consensus the package is no good). so that's the ebuild aspect.
> 
> profiles in other hand have been responsibility of the release@ team,
> but since that hasn't lately been really the case... qa@ has been taking
> care of it.
> 
> my point being: what does treecleaners have to do with profiles?
> 
Well basicaly i was not sure under what part it fits best.
And i usually cleanup stuff there when i do treecleaning thus i placed
it under them. Basicaly only thing relevant to the outsider should be
"QA is working on profiles" and not really care what subproject is
working on it.

The leveling i wrote here is just for some visual split to see where we
need to get "recruits" :]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkvQPsAACgkQHB6c3gNBRYc0dQCgrDcPiL4wkPBeh+kYoi7NdZ2M
8GEAnjNxeHCXjoF9WaWjO7z0VvqVbB7M
=YnPI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----