Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-qa
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-qa: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-qa@g.o
From: Diego Elio Pettenò <flameeyes@...>
Subject: Re: QA power to suspend access [WAS: Re: Roll-call for the team members and requesting a new election]
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 21:06:30 +0200
Il giorno ven, 03/09/2010 alle 19.43 +0300, Petteri Räty ha scritto:
> 
> It doesn't require infra as DevRel has the needed powers to shut down
> access. DevRel is needed any way to process the retirement. I think
> infra should only be the fallback if DevRel people with needed access
> are not available fast enough.

If you couldn't notice, we're explicitly trying to get this done without
DevRel intervention at first.

Right now we have something along these lines:

QA team member finds the screwup → reports to QA lead → ask nicely the
devrel read → devrel can sit thinking about it.

In the mean time, the person who was originally caught can keep
committing, eventually bringing up a problem worse than the previous
one, and so on so forth.

What _I_ would like to see for QA? (and think others would agree)

QA team member finds the screwup → track down another one that agrees on
the problem being big enough → they ask infra to suspend access → devrel
can either negotiate for the reinstatement or proceed with retirement.

-- 
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Attachment:
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part)
Replies:
Re: QA power to suspend access [WAS: Re: Roll-call for the team members and requesting a new election]
-- Petteri Räty
References:
QA power to suspend access [WAS: Re: Roll-call for the team members and requesting a new election]
-- Mark Loeser
Re: QA power to suspend access [WAS: Re: Roll-call for the team members and requesting a new election]
-- Diego Elio “Flameeyes” Pettenò
Re: QA power to suspend access [WAS: Re: Roll-call for the team members and requesting a new election]
-- Mark Loeser
Re: QA power to suspend access [WAS: Re: Roll-call for the team members and requesting a new election]
-- Petteri Räty
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-qa: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: QA power to suspend access [WAS: Re: Roll-call for the team members and requesting a new election]
Next by thread:
Re: QA power to suspend access [WAS: Re: Roll-call for the team members and requesting a new election]
Previous by date:
Re: QA power to suspend access [WAS: Re: Roll-call for the team members and requesting a new election]
Next by date:
Re: QA power to suspend access [WAS: Re: Roll-call for the team members and requesting a new election]


Updated Aug 26, 2011

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-qa mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.