On Monday 21 January 2008, Alec Warner wrote:
> On 1/21/08, Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote:
> > On Monday 21 January 2008, Alec Warner wrote:
> > > On 1/21/08, Mark Loeser <halcy0n@g.o> wrote:
> > > > Mark Loeser <halcy0n@g.o> said:
> > > > > So, I have been thinking about the slacker system as well.  Here's
> > > > > what I think we should be starting with as our plan to get back on
> > > > > our feet:
> > > > >
> > > > >  * Clear out the QA bugs.  We have several bugs that are assigned
> > > > > to us, or have us CC'd.  We should do something with these, not all
> > > > > are difficult, but require a few people doing some work.
> > > > >  * Get some sort of meetings or discussions going on the mailing
> > > > > list, and figure out a system to ensure that everyone on the team
> > > > > meets criteria we decide upon for them to be considered active. *
> > > > > Poll the user and dev communities to find out what they see as our
> > > > > biggest QA issues.  After we get those, we can prioritize them and
> > > > > find out which are even solvable.
> > > > >
> > > > > That's all I have for now...there are lots and lots of other things
> > > > > we can start to work on as well, but I think these should be our
> > > > > focus to start with.
> > > >
> > > > So, its been several days now.  Is anyone else interested in the QA
> > > > lead position besides myself?  How do my plans above sound?
> > >
> > > They sound like crap; but crap is better than what we have right now.
> >
> > could you elaborate at all ?
>
> The crap smells too, is that enough?

wanker :p
-mike