Gentoo Archives: gentoo-qa

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: Alec Warner <antarus@×××××××××××.com>
Cc: gentoo-qa@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-qa] qa lead election
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 00:51:25
Message-Id: 200801211951.19813.vapier@gentoo.org
1 On Monday 21 January 2008, Alec Warner wrote:
2 > On 1/21/08, Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote:
3 > > On Monday 21 January 2008, Alec Warner wrote:
4 > > > On 1/21/08, Mark Loeser <halcy0n@g.o> wrote:
5 > > > > Mark Loeser <halcy0n@g.o> said:
6 > > > > > So, I have been thinking about the slacker system as well. Here's
7 > > > > > what I think we should be starting with as our plan to get back on
8 > > > > > our feet:
9 > > > > >
10 > > > > > * Clear out the QA bugs. We have several bugs that are assigned
11 > > > > > to us, or have us CC'd. We should do something with these, not all
12 > > > > > are difficult, but require a few people doing some work.
13 > > > > > * Get some sort of meetings or discussions going on the mailing
14 > > > > > list, and figure out a system to ensure that everyone on the team
15 > > > > > meets criteria we decide upon for them to be considered active. *
16 > > > > > Poll the user and dev communities to find out what they see as our
17 > > > > > biggest QA issues. After we get those, we can prioritize them and
18 > > > > > find out which are even solvable.
19 > > > > >
20 > > > > > That's all I have for now...there are lots and lots of other things
21 > > > > > we can start to work on as well, but I think these should be our
22 > > > > > focus to start with.
23 > > > >
24 > > > > So, its been several days now. Is anyone else interested in the QA
25 > > > > lead position besides myself? How do my plans above sound?
26 > > >
27 > > > They sound like crap; but crap is better than what we have right now.
28 > >
29 > > could you elaborate at all ?
30 >
31 > The crap smells too, is that enough?
32
33 wanker :p
34 -mike

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature