Gentoo Archives: gentoo-qa

From: Mark Loeser <halcy0n@g.o>
To: gentoo-qa@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-qa] QA status update
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 15:43:52
Message-Id: 20090305154341.GE6002@aerie.halcy0n.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-qa] QA status update by Thilo Bangert
1 Thilo Bangert <bangert@g.o> said:
2 > from a qa perspective the devmanual is important to me. i have yet to
3 > contribute anything of substance, but have a few things in the pipeline.
4
5 If I don't response to any of your patches quick enough, make sure to
6 prod me and I'll commit them.
7
8 > also general qa bugwrangling do i consider important and i have been
9 > trying to file individual bugs for the few remaining mass ebuild/general
10 > issue bugs that are left.
11 >
12 > some of these qa checks are in need of being looked at again to catch
13 > regressions since the last time they were performed on the tree... but
14 > there are only that many hours in a day.
15
16 Yea, it would be great if we could start assisting maintainers with
17 resolving these bugs where ever we can as well :)
18
19 Thanks,
20
21 --
22 Mark Loeser
23 email - halcy0n AT gentoo DOT org
24 email - mark AT halcy0n DOT com
25 web - http://www.halcy0n.com