| 1 |
On Mon, 2004-02-02 at 23:34, John Davis wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> It does say in the ebuild that it is not for non-live merges, so I am |
| 4 |
> guessing that it still does not handle binary merges well these days :) |
| 5 |
> I am going to CC this to beejay and brad_mssw to see if we can all get |
| 6 |
> on the same page. I think that there is a fundamental communication |
| 7 |
> problem that is blocking us solving this bug. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I will say communication _is_ the problem. Unfortunately some do not |
| 11 |
think it important to let maintainers know about issues, or about them |
| 12 |
just fixing it. Sure, it might have been sent to releng, but also |
| 13 |
unfortunately some people did not think to let me know when not |
| 14 |
responding (if they have even noticed it) to releng, not thinking I |
| 15 |
might have a good reason like not being subscribed due to say being |
| 16 |
overlooked until about the 17th of last month (I think). |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Thanks, |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Martin Schlemmer |
| 24 |
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop/System Team Developer |
| 25 |
Cape Town, South Africa |
Archives