| 1 |
On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 17:50 +0200, Paul de Vrieze wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Friday 30 April 2004 17:16, Nathaniel McCallum wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 16:32 +0200, Paul de Vrieze wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > For me, this could best be implemented outside the gentoo project. We |
| 5 |
> > > could then list binary distro's based of gentoo or something like that. |
| 6 |
> > > We then need to add support for better binary dependency checking to |
| 7 |
> > > portage, but it should be possible to pull it off. Full continuously |
| 8 |
> > > updatable like debian is hard though and much of that work should be done |
| 9 |
> > > by the developers of such a gentoo based distro. |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > I think it could be implimented in Gentoo, however, the first thing that |
| 12 |
> > needs to happen is frozen trees with only security updates. This is of |
| 13 |
> > great desireability for our enterprise users. Once that is done, adding |
| 14 |
> > binary support to that frozen tree is fairly easy. For instance, lets |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> This disregards the quite essential "incremental" feature. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
What do you mean by "incremental"? Security updates? or |
| 19 |
debian-likeness? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Nathaniel |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-releng@g.o mailing list |
Archives