1 |
Alex Howells wrote: |
2 |
> On 05/02/2008, Dale <dalek1967@×××××××××.net> wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> If you plan to use XFS, make sure your UPS is working. In my |
5 |
>> experience, it does not like power failures at all. Maybe things have |
6 |
>> changed since tho. |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>> |
9 |
> |
10 |
> It uses very aggressive caching to get decent speed. Take a decent |
11 |
> database box with 32GB RAM, assume MySQL is underworked at the moment |
12 |
> and using 11GB then your power quits on ya.... chances are you just |
13 |
> lost 21GB of your "most used" data which would probably be most of |
14 |
> /var/lib/mysql ;) |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Under no circumstances is XFS safe without a UPS. It has not improved |
17 |
> in this regard and probably never will. Anyone advising you to deploy |
18 |
> XFS in a production environment without UPS on 'critical' data is a |
19 |
> fool. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Just my two cents, of course, and lets get back on topic? :) |
22 |
> |
23 |
|
24 |
That was my point. I lost a install once because of XFS and a power |
25 |
failure. It would not even think of booting again. I'm on reiserfs |
26 |
here and so far, so good. I guess all file systems have some good |
27 |
points and some bad points. Just got to know them before you choose the |
28 |
wrong one. :/ |
29 |
|
30 |
On point tho, is the last available "official" stage3 tarball the same |
31 |
as the one on the 2007 CD? |
32 |
|
33 |
Dale |
34 |
|
35 |
:-) :-) |