1 |
On Mon, 2003-12-29 at 06:26, Guy Martin wrote: |
2 |
> I do not agree on this point. |
3 |
> |
4 |
> Think that many users are lazy and will not check handbook is something |
5 |
> has changed. For examples, I sometimes have to add or remove advices |
6 |
> about CHOST, CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS in make.conf because toolchain or |
7 |
> something else is more or less stable than before with some settings. |
8 |
|
9 |
Then can we keep all the comments, etc in "make.conf.example" and keep |
10 |
make.conf as it is now with catalyst? |
11 |
|
12 |
We make.conf.example is made the new "exhaustive comment" version, then |
13 |
this solves the clutter problem and complex catalyst issues and also |
14 |
keeps the settings close enough to be useful. For example, the user |
15 |
could cp /etc/make.conf.example /etc/make.conf if he wants, or cut and |
16 |
paste from one to the other. |
17 |
|
18 |
Regards, |
19 |
|
20 |
Daniel |
21 |
|
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
gentoo-releng@g.o mailing list |