| 1 |
On Feb 1, 2008 11:10 AM, Peter Volkov <pva@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> ÷ ðÔÎ, 01/02/2008 × 10:12 +0100, Matthew ÐÉÛÅÔ: |
| 3 |
> > I don't know if it's even possible but: can the next livecd release |
| 4 |
> > please include reiser4-support? |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Please, search before post. This was already discussed here. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> -- |
| 9 |
> Peter. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
you mean this: |
| 13 |
http://209.85.129.104/search?q=cache:431L4rNtsKkJ:archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-releng/msg_03856.xml+site:archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-releng/+reiser4&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1 |
| 14 |
>Exactly. That was my entire point. If they're taking the time and |
| 15 |
>energy to build the stage themselves, perhaps they would understand some |
| 16 |
>of the issues and would be better educated. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
>Consider it a very high barrier of entry on the ability to be able to do |
| 19 |
>something extremely dumb with your system. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
>We don't put reiser4 tools on our CD, either. Why should we put stage1 |
| 22 |
>on there? Personally, I believe a stage1 to be much more dangerous and |
| 23 |
>time-wasting for us developers and our users than reiser4. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
that was the only hit I found for reiser4, (I apologize if there are |
| 26 |
more, I'm all new to this mailing list thingy ;) ) |
| 27 |
there isn't even an explanation why not |
| 28 |
times (and reiser4' maturiy) have changed |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
care to explain? |
| 31 |
many thanks in advance |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Mat |
Archives