| 1 |
On Monday 23 October 2006 14:17, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 2 |
> What would be best is if it looked for x.y.z first, then fell back to |
| 3 |
> x.y, in the case of us not being as fast with the config as the kernel |
| 4 |
> team with the kernel. ;] |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Another thing to realize is that while I will apply new configs/patches, |
| 7 |
> I'm not planning on making a genkernel release for changes as minor as a |
| 8 |
> new config. What I would suggest is that we make the "2.4" and "2.6" |
| 9 |
> configs be equal to the latest config, with the x.y.z being preferred, |
| 10 |
> if it exists. That way, when a new kernel comes out, it will start out |
| 11 |
> using the last good config, until it gets updated with its own x.y.z |
| 12 |
> config. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Ok, do you want patches againt 3.4.2? |
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
gentoo-releng@g.o mailing list |
Archives