1 |
On Monday 27 September 2004 12:40 am, Benjamin Judas wrote: |
2 |
> another suggestion from my side would be to replace |
3 |
> openoffice with openoffice-bin. Saves build time and |
4 |
> tmp-space on the buildbox. And also the chances are |
5 |
> 99% that the result of the compile run does actually |
6 |
> work :) |
7 |
> |
8 |
> I don't know how/if openoffice-bin is handled for other |
9 |
> archs (amd64, ppc, sparc). |
10 |
|
11 |
I second this. It would keep amd64's GRP closer in line with x86, since we |
12 |
only use openoffice-bin at the moment. OpenOffice can't be 64bit-compiled |
13 |
from source on amd64. |
14 |
|
15 |
-- |
16 |
Jason Huebel |
17 |
Gentoo/amd64 Strategic Lead |
18 |
Gentoo Developer Relations/Recruiter |
19 |
|
20 |
GPG Public Key: |
21 |
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9BA9E230 |
22 |
|
23 |
"Do not weep; do not wax indignant. Understand." |
24 |
Baruch Spinoza (1632 - 1677) |