[gentoo-releng] Re: binutils-2.14.90.0.7-r4

[Kumba]

Martin Schlemmer wrote:

> Not sure, but I would like to get gcc-3.3.2-r5 or so in as well.  Is
> this still possible ?
>
>
> Thanks,

I'm building mips stages with gcc-3.3.2-r4.  -r5 will not merge on my 
Indy, although other mips users (with roughly the same Indy specs I 
have) have reported success with that version of gcc.  It keeps getting 
to a C++ source file in the final stages of gcc's bootstrap, and just 
hangs the compile up.  Doesn't hang the box, and no error messages or 
zombified processes that I can find.  Still doing research into the 
cause, I'm beginning to think I have something funny going on with the 
chroot environment.

As for sparc, we've been using the gcc33-sparc64-1.4 profile to test 
gcc-3.3.x on sparc.  Whether it is safe enough to declare stable, I'll 
let Weeve make that call.

x86, I've had no problems really.  Just we need to get the new etcat 
version out because gcc-3.3.2-r5 scans for the @guard symbols, and older 
etcat versions do not work with the newer 2.0.50 portage, causing the 
ebuild to fail (this has been my experience on sparc64 actually, but I 
would not be surprised for this to popup up elsewhere for those who 
haven't upgraded gentoolkit yet (like me)).


--Kumba

-- 
"Such is oft the course of deeds that move the wheels of the world: 
small hands do them because they must, while the eyes of the great are 
elsewhere."  --Elrond


--
gentoo-releng@g.o mailing list