| 1 |
On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 23:38, Brad House wrote: |
| 2 |
> >> This is not an issue if you use cdfs/loop type of zisofs or noloop |
| 3 |
> >> as there is no loop device to be umounted. |
| 4 |
> >> |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > Ok, I changed things a bit, so might have expected I guess. I do |
| 7 |
> > however have an issue with the naming. Some time ago it was decided |
| 8 |
> > that it should be /mnt/livecd. Now it changed again. Can we decide |
| 9 |
> > on something now? If so, fix is easy. |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Well, it's mounting to /mnt/loop right now. I had no idea there was |
| 13 |
> a current naming convention (I did not have access to the prior 2.4 |
| 14 |
> kernel livecd scripts that did any sort of loop mounting). This would be |
| 15 |
> an easy change to make to whatever you want it to be, as it's just a |
| 16 |
> couple of lines in the genkernel linuxrc that need to be changed, just |
| 17 |
> let me know, as I needed to roll another genkernel that had some |
| 18 |
> fixes people posted in bugs.gentoo.org (along with some suggested |
| 19 |
> doc changes), |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
I do not have an issue, but '/mnt/livecd' or similar will be more |
| 22 |
generic between different approaches. I will leave it up to you |
| 23 |
guys for final decision though. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
> before I totally abandon that project (as previously |
| 26 |
> discussed). |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
No need to be rash. If you still feel this way in a week, sure. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Cheers, |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Martin Schlemmer |
| 37 |
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop/System Team Developer |
| 38 |
Cape Town, South Africa |
Archives