Gentoo Archives: gentoo-releng

From: Jon Portnoy <avenj@g.o>
To: gentoo-releng@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-releng] gentoo-dev-sources
Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2004 00:04:02
Message-Id: 20040705000354.GA28356@cerberus.oppresses.us
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-releng] gentoo-dev-sources by Luca Barbato
1 On Mon, Jul 05, 2004 at 01:52:40AM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote:
2 > Jon Portnoy wrote:
3 > >ChangeLog is useful:
4 > >
5 > > 21 Jun 2004; Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@g.o>
6 > > +gentoo-dev-sources-2.6.7-r2.ebuild:
7 > > Removed 2710_amd76x-acpi.patch as it can be a standalone package
8 > > Removed 4720_gcloop-2.6-20040510.patch as it can be a standalone
9 > >package
10 > > (and the code style was horrible...)
11 > >
12 > I'd like to have those "coding style" issues pointed out, so I could fix
13 > them.
14 > I can agree that the current way I'm using to *building* it isn't really
15 > the sanest but as I stated many times: I DO NOT HAVE THE TIME TO
16 > KERNELIFY UCL and since ucl is giving good results even if I just took
17 > the compiled objects and I glue them in a kernel wrapper that was a good
18 > solution. I'm under exams and I can't reimplement ucl in kernel as
19 > happened for zlib.
20 > If the issue is really in the code (not the way it got linked) please
21 > tell me as soon as possible.
22 >
23 > Regards
24 >
25 > lu
26 >
27 > PS: Better comunication could avoid such _lack_ of style in Changelogs.
28 >
29
30 I recommend sending this to the kernel folks, not -releng. (I don't
31 think Greg's on this list)
32
33 --
34 Jon Portnoy
35 avenj/irc.freenode.net
36
37 --
38 gentoo-releng@g.o mailing list