Gentoo Archives: gentoo-releng

From: Daniel Robbins <drobbins@g.o>
To: Martin Schlemmer <azarah@××××××××××××.org>
Cc: John Davis <zhen@g.o>, gentoo-releng@l.g.o, Brad House <brad_mssw@g.o>, Gentoo-Base-System <base-system@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-releng] Re: baselayout changes for livecds
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 05:24:55
Message-Id: 1074403493.4523.47.camel@music.gentoo.org
1 On Sat, 2004-01-17 at 15:53, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
2 > Point I wanted to make, was that you do not need whatever in a stable
3 > baselayout, as it _only_ affects the livecd, or do I miss something?
4
5 It looks like Brad found a good workaround for this. We can unmask the
6 baselayout we need (-r4) in our catalyst portage snapshot, and force a
7 re-merge of baselayout on the livecd by listing it in livecd/packages:
8 in the catalyst spec file.
9
10 And in hindsight, I guess it's good that our baselayout is masked -* for
11 now, as we may need additional fixes in the coming week or two and may
12 not want to keep pushing out new stable baselayouts every few days just
13 for livecd stuff.
14
15 Sorry for any pushiness from us; we've been working extra-hard on
16 catalyst and we can become frantic because of our desire to have
17 catalyst livecds work for people asap -- which then opens up the
18 possibility of sleeping more, catching up on other important work, and
19 having a real life again :) A lot of it is also that we know that other
20 people are waiting for us, which puts pressure on us to work too hard --
21 and then we start demanding that from others which isn't fair, or in
22 this case even necessary.
23
24 For 2004.0, our deadline needs to be "as soon as possible -- without
25 working too hard, being too pushy, getting frantic or burning out." And
26 in that, we will try to do a better job.
27
28 Best Regards,
29
30 Daniel
31
32
33
34 --
35 gentoo-releng@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-releng] Re: baselayout changes for livecds Martin Schlemmer <azarah@g.o>