1 |
On Sat, 2004-01-17 at 15:53, Martin Schlemmer wrote: |
2 |
> Point I wanted to make, was that you do not need whatever in a stable |
3 |
> baselayout, as it _only_ affects the livecd, or do I miss something? |
4 |
|
5 |
It looks like Brad found a good workaround for this. We can unmask the |
6 |
baselayout we need (-r4) in our catalyst portage snapshot, and force a |
7 |
re-merge of baselayout on the livecd by listing it in livecd/packages: |
8 |
in the catalyst spec file. |
9 |
|
10 |
And in hindsight, I guess it's good that our baselayout is masked -* for |
11 |
now, as we may need additional fixes in the coming week or two and may |
12 |
not want to keep pushing out new stable baselayouts every few days just |
13 |
for livecd stuff. |
14 |
|
15 |
Sorry for any pushiness from us; we've been working extra-hard on |
16 |
catalyst and we can become frantic because of our desire to have |
17 |
catalyst livecds work for people asap -- which then opens up the |
18 |
possibility of sleeping more, catching up on other important work, and |
19 |
having a real life again :) A lot of it is also that we know that other |
20 |
people are waiting for us, which puts pressure on us to work too hard -- |
21 |
and then we start demanding that from others which isn't fair, or in |
22 |
this case even necessary. |
23 |
|
24 |
For 2004.0, our deadline needs to be "as soon as possible -- without |
25 |
working too hard, being too pushy, getting frantic or burning out." And |
26 |
in that, we will try to do a better job. |
27 |
|
28 |
Best Regards, |
29 |
|
30 |
Daniel |
31 |
|
32 |
|
33 |
|
34 |
-- |
35 |
gentoo-releng@g.o mailing list |