Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
On Mon, 2004-02-02 at 23:34, John Davis wrote:
> It does say in the ebuild that it is not for non-live merges, so I am
> guessing that it still does not handle binary merges well these days :)
> I am going to CC this to beejay and brad_mssw to see if we can all get
> on the same page. I think that there is a fundamental communication
> problem that is blocking us solving this bug.
>
I will say communication _is_ the problem. Unfortunately some do not
think it important to let maintainers know about issues, or about them
just fixing it. Sure, it might have been sent to releng, but also
unfortunately some people did not think to let me know when not
responding (if they have even noticed it) to releng, not thinking I
might have a good reason like not being subscribed due to say being
overlooked until about the 17th of last month (I think).
Thanks,
--
Martin Schlemmer
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop/System Team Developer
Cape Town, South Africa
|
| Attachment: |
|
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part)
|
|
