Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
<html>
<head>
<style>
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
FONT-SIZE: 10pt;
FONT-FAMILY:Tahoma
}
</style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
Hi Andrew, and what about if the Gentoo devs release after 3 months a new tarball for the new user...if will remove the need to update their box and also, maybe it's a good idea to refresh the tarball between 2 majors profiles..<br><br>Sylvain<br><br>> Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 20:33:01 -0600<br>> From: agaffney@g.o<br>> To: gentoo-releng@g.o<br>> Subject: Re: [gentoo-releng] Call for feature request for 2008.0<br>> <br>> Sylvain Alain wrote:<br>> > Hi, I'm not sure if I'm on the right list, but I would like to know what <br>> > do you think of the Daniel Robbins Idea of creating tarball stages every <br>> > weeks are so : http://www.funtoo.org/linux/<br>> > <br>> > For now it's a good idea because of the expat problem and the age of the <br>> > official tarball, but in future can Gentoo provide more up to date <br>> > tarball for the users ?<br>> <br>> Please, please don't top-post.<br>> <br>> The problem with drobbins's weekly stage tarballs is that there is absolutely <br>> zero QA done on them. We can't with good conscience release completely untested <br>> stage tarballs out into the wild. We also don't want to have to deal with bug <br>> reports that would stem from this.<br>> <br>> -- <br>> Andrew Gaffney http://dev.gentoo.org/~agaffney/<br>> Gentoo Linux Developer Catalyst/Installer + x86 release coordinator<br>> -- <br>> gentoo-releng@g.o mailing list<br>> <br><br /><hr /> <a href='' target='_new'></a></body>
</html> |
|
