| 1 |
Hi Andrew, and what about if the Gentoo devs release after 3 months a new tarball for the new user...if will remove the need to update their box and also, maybe it's a good idea to refresh the tarball between 2 majors profiles.. |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Sylvain |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 20:33:01 -0600 |
| 6 |
> From: agaffney@g.o |
| 7 |
> To: gentoo-releng@l.g.o |
| 8 |
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-releng] Call for feature request for 2008.0 |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Sylvain Alain wrote: |
| 11 |
> > Hi, I'm not sure if I'm on the right list, but I would like to know what |
| 12 |
> > do you think of the Daniel Robbins Idea of creating tarball stages every |
| 13 |
> > weeks are so : http://www.funtoo.org/linux/ |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > For now it's a good idea because of the expat problem and the age of the |
| 16 |
> > official tarball, but in future can Gentoo provide more up to date |
| 17 |
> > tarball for the users ? |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Please, please don't top-post. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> The problem with drobbins's weekly stage tarballs is that there is absolutely |
| 22 |
> zero QA done on them. We can't with good conscience release completely untested |
| 23 |
> stage tarballs out into the wild. We also don't want to have to deal with bug |
| 24 |
> reports that would stem from this. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> -- |
| 27 |
> Andrew Gaffney http://dev.gentoo.org/~agaffney/ |
| 28 |
> Gentoo Linux Developer Catalyst/Installer + x86 release coordinator |
| 29 |
> -- |
| 30 |
> gentoo-releng@l.g.o mailing list |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
_________________________________________________________________ |
Archives