1 |
On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 14:27 -0500, solar wrote: |
2 |
> You cant really do a server profile so far nested within the |
3 |
> default-linux profiles. The flags will be just wrong. |
4 |
|
5 |
Have you verified this or are you just assuming? |
6 |
|
7 |
> Also a server is not something you should be switching profiles every 6 |
8 |
> months. |
9 |
|
10 |
This I definitely agree with, with the exception that I am specifically |
11 |
looking to create a profile set that *is* changed every release. The |
12 |
main difference here would be that profiles would be deprecated/removed |
13 |
at a *much* slower rate. |
14 |
|
15 |
> If you are serious about a server profile I'd suggest dropping what you |
16 |
> are thinking now. Lets have a meeting (hardened + server + infra + |
17 |
> releng ) folks and do it right together. |
18 |
|
19 |
I'm not sure what either Infra or Hardened would have to do with |
20 |
"default-linux" stuff, except that their input would be very valued as |
21 |
they would be experienced in these matters. I have no problem with |
22 |
having some sort of meeting. My primary reason for the profile is to |
23 |
keep all of the "cruft" from dev-lang/php out of the desktop profiles |
24 |
and to keep the gnome and kde stuff out of the server profile. I *know* |
25 |
that they're not perfect or even what is necessarily desired, which was |
26 |
the point of including all of the profile stuff in the original email. |
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
Chris Gianelloni |
30 |
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead |
31 |
x86 Architecture Team |
32 |
Games - Developer |
33 |
Gentoo Linux |