Gentoo Archives: gentoo-releng

From: Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o>
To: gentoo-releng@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-releng] Feature Requests for 2006.1
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 19:55:05
Message-Id: 1142365861.21388.30.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-releng] Feature Requests for 2006.1 by solar
1 On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 14:27 -0500, solar wrote:
2 > You cant really do a server profile so far nested within the
3 > default-linux profiles. The flags will be just wrong.
4
5 Have you verified this or are you just assuming?
6
7 > Also a server is not something you should be switching profiles every 6
8 > months.
9
10 This I definitely agree with, with the exception that I am specifically
11 looking to create a profile set that *is* changed every release. The
12 main difference here would be that profiles would be deprecated/removed
13 at a *much* slower rate.
14
15 > If you are serious about a server profile I'd suggest dropping what you
16 > are thinking now. Lets have a meeting (hardened + server + infra +
17 > releng ) folks and do it right together.
18
19 I'm not sure what either Infra or Hardened would have to do with
20 "default-linux" stuff, except that their input would be very valued as
21 they would be experienced in these matters. I have no problem with
22 having some sort of meeting. My primary reason for the profile is to
23 keep all of the "cruft" from dev-lang/php out of the desktop profiles
24 and to keep the gnome and kde stuff out of the server profile. I *know*
25 that they're not perfect or even what is necessarily desired, which was
26 the point of including all of the profile stuff in the original email.
27
28 --
29 Chris Gianelloni
30 Release Engineering - Strategic Lead
31 x86 Architecture Team
32 Games - Developer
33 Gentoo Linux

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-releng] Feature Requests for 2006.1 solar <solar@g.o>