| 1 |
On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 23:39, Daniel Robbins wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 2004-01-18 at 10:34, Martin Schlemmer wrote: |
| 3 |
> > So I do propose that catalyst rather install livecd-functions.sh by |
| 4 |
> > itself, as it will: |
| 5 |
> > 1) Not need a remerge |
| 6 |
> > 2) Keep livecd-functions.sh seperate, so future fixes will not need |
| 7 |
> > a baselayout bump, but just an catalyst one. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> OK, let's support a USE="livecd" but *only* for baselayout at this point |
| 10 |
> (don't want it to be used for other ebuilds for 2004.0.) If |
| 11 |
> USE="livecd", then livecd-functions.sh gets installed. And you can add a |
| 12 |
> "[ -f livecd-functions.sh ] && source" conditional. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Will that work for everyone? Please? :) |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Yep. Sorry, but I am just anti-bloat in baselayout =) Brad do have a |
| 18 |
point though - can catalyst remerge baselayout? Or can it rather |
| 19 |
install livecd-functions.sh. I am not sure about the 'hack' level that |
| 20 |
will be (as Brad keeps calling it), but then I have not had a chance to |
| 21 |
look at catalyst as of yet. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Martin Schlemmer |
| 27 |
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop/System Team Developer |
| 28 |
Cape Town, South Africa |
Archives