| 1 |
> Is there a better choice for subarches to keep? Can x86 cover the i486 |
| 2 |
> and i586 people, or do we need to ditch i686 and add in a i586 set? |
| 3 |
> Should we do three sets and have ix86, i586, and i686? |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> My argument for keeping i686 is the sheer number of machines out there |
| 6 |
> that are i686 and above. I think that x86 and i686 offer the most |
| 7 |
> flexibility for what we can offer. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Come to think of it, actually, I agree with you -- x86 and 686 probably |
| 10 |
cover the gambit. If we felt like going out on a limb, a 586 might not |
| 11 |
hurt. |
| 12 |
-- |
| 13 |
Seemant Kulleen |
| 14 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~seemant |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x3458780E |
| 17 |
Key fingerprint = 23A9 7CB5 9BBB 4F8D 549B 6593 EDA2 65D8 3458 780E |
Archives