| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Tuesday 29 June 2004 12:22 pm, Jeffrey Forman wrote: |
| 5 |
> I'm only concerned with this bloating the livecd past levels where they |
| 6 |
> still fit in traditional media without breaking out compression-fu to |
| 7 |
> get it working. to be honest, do that many people NEED samba support |
| 8 |
> during the installation of gentoo? |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> my 2 brain cells |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> -jeff |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 11:37, John Davis wrote: |
| 15 |
> > Hey all - |
| 16 |
> > SMB shares are fun and useful, but our present livecds are unable to |
| 17 |
> > mount them. We do in fact have smbfs support in the kernel, but like |
| 18 |
> > nfs, smb needs its userland tool samba to complete the mount (iirc). So, |
| 19 |
> > are there any major objections to adding samba onto our livecds? |
| 20 |
> > |
| 21 |
> > Cheers, |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
I'm on the fence on this one. I could see where a person might want to grab |
| 24 |
the stage tarball off of another machine (that perhaps has a windows or samba |
| 25 |
share), but other than that I don't see much use for it... |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
- -- |
| 28 |
Jason Huebel |
| 29 |
Gentoo/amd64 Strategic Lead |
| 30 |
Gentoo Developer Relations/Recruiter |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
GPG Public Key: |
| 33 |
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9BA9E230 |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
"Do not weep; do not wax indignant. Understand." |
| 36 |
Baruch Spinoza (1632 - 1677) |
| 37 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 38 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
iD8DBQFA4aczbNgbbJup4jARAq9IAJ9+3cEF9rgApMQrOun51cIkyVqJ7wCgq2SI |
| 41 |
kLuWZWD+Q0Ksh6m0VDTBxRA= |
| 42 |
=iWvx |
| 43 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
-- |
| 46 |
gentoo-releng@g.o mailing list |
Archives