| 1 |
(Responding to both lists. Please keep further correspondence on this |
| 2 |
to gentoo-catalyst). |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 12:11 -0800, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote: |
| 5 |
> Is there a "generic" bug for this testing, or should we just file them |
| 6 |
> against catalyst-2.0_pre200511xx individually? |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
File separate bugs, please. We consider catalyst 2.x to be as ready to |
| 9 |
go as catalyst 1.x ever was, but would like just a bit more testing. |
| 10 |
Having individual bugs at this point makes tracking easier than a single |
| 11 |
bug. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> I just started the testing, so I'm guessing it will be a while before I |
| 14 |
> need to file any bugs. I doubt if I'll hit anything until I start trying |
| 15 |
> to build my personalized LiveCDs; everything else is vanilla i686 up to |
| 16 |
> that point. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I have built a few CDs now and have found it to work quite well... |
| 19 |
especially after we squashed the "x86 and amd64 CDs don't boot" |
| 20 |
problem... ;] |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Chris Gianelloni |
| 24 |
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead |
| 25 |
x86 Architecture Team |
| 26 |
Games - Developer |
| 27 |
Gentoo Linux |
Archives