Gentoo Archives: gentoo-releng

From: Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o>
To: gentoo-releng@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-releng] gentoo-dev-sources
Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2004 23:56:10
Message-Id: 40E89848.1060202@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-releng] gentoo-dev-sources by Jon Portnoy
1 Jon Portnoy wrote:
2 > ChangeLog is useful:
3 >
4 > 21 Jun 2004; Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@g.o>
5 > +gentoo-dev-sources-2.6.7-r2.ebuild:
6 > Removed 2710_amd76x-acpi.patch as it can be a standalone package
7 > Removed 4720_gcloop-2.6-20040510.patch as it can be a standalone
8 > package
9 > (and the code style was horrible...)
10 >
11 I'd like to have those "coding style" issues pointed out, so I could fix
12 them.
13 I can agree that the current way I'm using to *building* it isn't really
14 the sanest but as I stated many times: I DO NOT HAVE THE TIME TO
15 KERNELIFY UCL and since ucl is giving good results even if I just took
16 the compiled objects and I glue them in a kernel wrapper that was a good
17 solution. I'm under exams and I can't reimplement ucl in kernel as
18 happened for zlib.
19 If the issue is really in the code (not the way it got linked) please
20 tell me as soon as possible.
21
22 Regards
23
24 lu
25
26 PS: Better comunication could avoid such _lack_ of style in Changelogs.
27
28 --
29 Luca Barbato
30 Developer
31 Gentoo Linux http://www.gentoo.org/~lu_zero
32
33
34
35 --
36 gentoo-releng@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-releng] gentoo-dev-sources Jon Portnoy <avenj@g.o>