| 1 |
On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 14:27 -0800, Anthony Gorecki wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Monday, October 31, 2005 14:26, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 3 |
> > It *does* however guarantee that you have a minimal working system of |
| 4 |
> > known quality with which to do your installation from, rather than a |
| 5 |
> > completely hacked and limited functionality minimal environment designed |
| 6 |
> > only to support the building of a minimal working system. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> It is for that reason that I support keeping stage one tarballs available. |
| 9 |
> Cheers for the stubborn. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Huh? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
You support keeping a stage1 tarball around because it is a completely |
| 14 |
hacked and broken minimal environment capable of *only* supporting the |
| 15 |
bootstrap operation? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Chris Gianelloni |
| 19 |
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead |
| 20 |
x86 Architecture Team |
| 21 |
Games - Developer |
| 22 |
Gentoo Linux |
Archives