| 1 |
On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 12:23, Kumba wrote: |
| 2 |
> John Davis wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> > Hi all - |
| 5 |
> > I am going to delay catalyst 1.0.5 until later tonite (or early tomorrow |
| 6 |
> > morning) due to a bug in the default-runscript.sh that is the root of |
| 7 |
> > the modules-update problems. If you remember, there are a lot of errors |
| 8 |
> > about modules.conf not being created, etc. |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > Beejay is working hard on a patch for this and says that he is close. I |
| 11 |
> > will keep you all informed. |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > Cheers, |
| 14 |
> > //zhen |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Just thought I'd fire this off as a shot, but when catalyst builds |
| 17 |
> stages, it autogenerates a make.conf in the stage that is rather sparse. |
| 18 |
> Any thought on having it copy over an existing portage copy of |
| 19 |
> make.conf for the applied arch? |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> btw, that patch to bootstrap from months ago, that ever get put into |
| 22 |
> bootstrap.sh? I know there was some theoretical conditional that |
| 23 |
> drobbins said could pop up, but I never figured it out. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> --Kumba |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Kumba - |
| 29 |
Yeah, that make.conf is created on purpose. A more verbose |
| 30 |
make.conf.example is installed by Portage though. It mimics the old |
| 31 |
style make.conf that has comments all over. The verbosity still exists, |
| 32 |
just in another file. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Which patch? The emerge_opts patch so that the user can add emerge flags |
| 35 |
such as 'pv'? The patch is not part of catalyst, so I can apply it |
| 36 |
anytime. I would like to apply it, but I have not heard any feedback ... |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
Cheers, |
| 39 |
//zhen |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
-- |
| 42 |
John Davis |
| 43 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 44 |
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~zhen> |
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
---- |
| 47 |
GnuPG Public Key: <http://dev.gentoo.org/~zhen/zhen_pub.asc> |
| 48 |
Fingerprint: 2364 71BD 4BC2 705D F338 FF70 6650 1235 1946 2D47 |
Archives