On Mon, 2004-02-09 at 01:12, Brad House wrote:
> ok, I finished testing baselayout 184.108.40.206 for livecds. It appears
> the only problem existed in the ebuild that I reported before
> use livecd && livecd-functions.sh -->
> use livecd && dosbin livecd-functions.sh
> So if someone commits that fix, it should be fine. I tested both
> cdfs types of zisofs and normal, and did not find problems with
Sorry all. I really tried to get to everything and more yesterday,
and made a small slip-up.
> > On Sun, 2004-02-08 at 12:45, Brad House wrote:
> >> I am going to still recommend that those people who need to build
> >> livecds make use of baselayout-220.127.116.11-r4 that I had committed,
> >> as it is the only one I know of that has been tested and verified
> >> to work.
> > Brad, have releng get any needed baselayout fixes to me, and I will roll
> > a new stable baselayout release for you (and commit baselayout cvs and
> > to the portage tree.) Please base your work on what is current in
> > baselayout cvs, and test your work on livecds and on normal Gentoo
> > systems.
> > Martin, sorry to have to do this (I would much rather *not* have to do
> > this, as I have other stuff I could be doing,) but I don't see you
> > making any meaningful effort to work with these people. They have
> > repeatedly been making a very sincere effort to coordinate with you, and
> > they deserve much more than what they have been getting.
> > Sincerely,
> > Daniel
> > --
> > firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop/System Team Developer
Cape Town, South Africa