| 1 |
On Wed, 2004-04-28 at 17:58, John Davis wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 2004-04-28 at 17:52, Kurt Lieber wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 05:36:13PM -0400 or thereabouts, Nathaniel McCallum wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > I thought online GRP packages would be with this release, however, I'm |
| 5 |
> > > not seeing GRP packages on any of the mirrors. Am I in |
| 6 |
> > > cloud-cuckoo-land? |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > This didn't make it into 2004.1. |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > --kurt |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> I purposely excluded them because I am working on the following: |
| 13 |
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~zhen/glep0026.txt |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Keep in mind that it is very, very rough. Very. I mean it! You get the |
| 16 |
> jist though. Now that 2004.1 is done, I can focus some of my time on it |
| 17 |
> and make it formal. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Note that this may make compile time on other-arch boxes a bottleneck, |
| 20 |
especially if every change is expected to be provided in GRP form. I |
| 21 |
would more strongly support a consistent release cycle for GRPs |
| 22 |
(bi-quarterly, perhaps) with exceptions for security or |
| 23 |
otherwise-critical updates. |
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Donnie Berkholz |
| 26 |
Gentoo Linux |
Archives