On Monday 23 October 2006 14:17, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> What would be best is if it looked for x.y.z first, then fell back to
> x.y, in the case of us not being as fast with the config as the kernel
> team with the kernel.  ;]
>
> Another thing to realize is that while I will apply new configs/patches,
> I'm not planning on making a genkernel release for changes as minor as a
> new config.  What I would suggest is that we make the "2.4" and "2.6"
> configs be equal to the latest config, with the x.y.z being preferred,
> if it exists.  That way, when a new kernel comes out, it will start out
> using the last good config, until it gets updated with its own x.y.z
> config.

Ok, do you want patches againt 3.4.2?
-- 
gentoo-releng@g.o mailing list