1 |
On 12 Feb 2004, at 01:24, Daniel Robbins wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> OK, I don't like the direction this is taking. I'd like to be able to |
4 |
> back you up on your story but I can't. I think Brad's assessment is |
5 |
> correct. |
6 |
|
7 |
Brad's assessment says we are intentionally -refusing- to commit. I |
8 |
don't like such a theme, and I certainly don't think it is correct. |
9 |
|
10 |
We're doing as much as possible to ensure ppc has a 2004.0 genkernel |
11 |
profile and to ensure 2004.0 is fully build by catalyst. |
12 |
However, it is clear that genkernel in its current form would probably |
13 |
not allow us to update the kde/gnome cd before 2004.0: |
14 |
My request for both an informal genkernel and catalyst status update |
15 |
(on the 2nd of february) are still unanswered. |
16 |
A direct result is that I couldn't tell whether cloop was planned or |
17 |
not. |
18 |
|
19 |
A cd was needed for fosdem (already on the 22nd of february), requested |
20 |
by the store, and hasn't been updated for a long while. |
21 |
I wanted to update the kde/gnome cd, and have reused the same initrd |
22 |
for the other cds, to avoid duplicating work. |
23 |
PPC is fully committed to both genkernel and catalyst (both are |
24 |
excellent products). |
25 |
|
26 |
I am going to create and commit a genkernel profile today. Again, we |
27 |
are not refusing to commit but rather limited in time and manpower. |
28 |
Next time, please ask. |
29 |
|
30 |
Pieter |
31 |
|
32 |
|
33 |
-- |
34 |
gentoo-releng@g.o mailing list |