| 1 |
Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>As you can probably guess by the subject, I've added |
| 4 |
>catalyst-2.0_pre20051111 to the tree. I plan on finalizing catalyst 2.0 |
| 5 |
>by the end of the month, so I really need testers for this. If you have |
| 6 |
>questions about this release, feel free to ask them on gentoo-catalyst. |
| 7 |
>For bugs, please files bugs. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Is there a "generic" bug for this testing, or should we just file them |
| 12 |
against catalyst-2.0_pre200511xx individually? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
I just started the testing, so I'm guessing it will be a while before I |
| 15 |
need to file any bugs. I doubt if I'll hit anything until I start trying |
| 16 |
to build my personalized LiveCDs; everything else is vanilla i686 up to |
| 17 |
that point. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
http://linuxcapacityplanning.com |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-releng@g.o mailing list |
Archives