| 1 |
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote: |
| 2 |
> davecode@××××××××××.net wrote: |
| 3 |
>>> run ~arch with XFS on a desktop system that doesn't have a UPS |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> Guilty as charged. Running Debian unstable on XFS for years, through |
| 6 |
>> dozens of storm blackouts, and zero data loss. Ext3 lost plenty of data |
| 7 |
>> before we gave up on it. Have no intention of using ext4, either. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Ah ... I've been running (Gentoo) reiser3 on my workstation here. I |
| 10 |
> never thought to try XFS or JFS, but I too have given up on ext3 |
| 11 |
> (ecause it's slow). reiser3 can be slow on writing, though. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
If you plan to use XFS, make sure your UPS is working. In my |
| 14 |
experience, it does not like power failures at all. Maybe things have |
| 15 |
changed since tho. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Dale |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
:-) :-) |
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-releng@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives