Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship

Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-releng
Lists: gentoo-releng: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
To: Sven Blumenstein <bazik@g.o>
From: Martin Schlemmer <azarah@g.o>
Subject: Re: binutils-
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 14:36:22 +0200
On Sun, 2004-01-18 at 14:10, Sven Blumenstein wrote:
> Kumba wrote:
> > As for sparc, we've been using the gcc33-sparc64-1.4 profile to test 
> > gcc-3.3.x on sparc.  Whether it is safe enough to declare stable, I'll 
> > let Weeve make that call.
> I've been using the gcc33 profile since you released it.
>  From my experience, gcc 3.3.x is save to use, BUT it can cause problems
> if you upgrade a gcc 3.2.x compiled system to gcc 3.3.x. I've heard that 
> some bigger applications like Mozilla just refuse to start which may IMO 
> be an library issue. If a user recompiles his 'world' after upgrading 
> from 3.2 to 3.3 it shouldnt be a problem. But this cannot be guaranteed.

Do we have more concrete evidence then hear-say?  I know initial 3.3's
and 3.3.1's was flaky, but 3.3.2's since -r2 or there abouts have really
behaved Ok.


Martin Schlemmer
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop/System Team Developer
Cape Town, South Africa

signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part)
Re: binutils-
-- Martin Schlemmer
Re: binutils-
-- Kumba
Lists: gentoo-releng: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: binutils-
Next by thread:
Release Notes
Previous by date:
Re: binutils-
Next by date:
Re: binutils-

Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-releng mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.