1 |
Andrew Gaffney pisze: |
2 |
> Brent Baude wrote: |
3 |
>> Andrew Gaffney wrote: |
4 |
>>> Kamil Górnik wrote: |
5 |
>>>> Hi, |
6 |
>>>> |
7 |
>>>> I suffer lack of vi (vim) on stage3 since ever. It's not a big |
8 |
>>>> binary and still there are those who prefer vi to nano. |
9 |
>>>> Every time I install gentoo the first time I need to do after |
10 |
>>>> setting up the system is emerging vi before emerge -Du world. |
11 |
>>> |
12 |
>>> We will *never* include vim instead of nano, simple because |
13 |
>>> *everybody* can use nano, which many people have no fscking clue how |
14 |
>>> to use vim. I've been a linux user for almost 8 years, and I've never |
15 |
>>> learned how to use vim. We also will not include *both* packages, |
16 |
>>> because that would bloat the stages unnecessarily. |
17 |
>>> |
18 |
>>> Just because you prefer vim instead of nano doesn't mean we should |
19 |
>>> use it. There are many aspects of the release where somebody thinks |
20 |
>>> that *their* preference is the correct one. It usually isn't :P |
21 |
>>> |
22 |
>> I've heard this numerous times. And Andrew is correct in that stage 3 |
23 |
>> should not ever include vim. That said, how about a static version of |
24 |
>> vim that could hang out somewhere and be brought down and used quite |
25 |
>> easily. I'll leave it to ya'll to figure that one out. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> The busybox binary included in the stage3 has vi support built-in. If |
28 |
> you really want to use vi, you can just do 'busybox vi /path/to/file'. |
29 |
> |
30 |
|
31 |
ok, last response settles the matter for me :) I was required to learn |
32 |
vi at university and just got used of it. I'm just unabled to use |
33 |
anything apart of vi... And there's no need to start a war because of it ;) |
34 |
Binary static version would require preparation for many ~archs... Once |
35 |
busybox has vi support we can 'EOF' this thread. |
36 |
-- |
37 |
gentoo-releng@l.g.o mailing list |